Why some misinformed voters supported McBush/Palin even though Obama promised not to tax 95% of us?
Q. I am a librarian and I make $46,000 and my husband lost his job and gas is expensive and God knows I do not need any new taxes and I am sure that neither do you. And yesterday I read in a newspaper The Wall Street Journal that Sen. Baucus, the Finance Committee chairman considers new regressive taxes on poor folks like myself. His tax ideas include: to tax health care plans, penalize soda-pop drinking, tax alcohol, tax salty foods, further raise the price of cigarettes, charge for carbon, cut Medicare payments, or even implement a national sales tax. Fortunately I voted for Barack Obama and we won and he promised no new taxes on 95% of Americans an I am sure that he will veto all such plans. Like he fulfilled his promises of new… [cont.]
Asked by Teresa Jackson - Mon Jun 15 15:54:11 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. How do you think Pres. Obama is going to pay for all his programs? You're going to be taxed no matter what he promised. It will be either a direct taxation or by sneaking taxes onto certain products or even taxing the air you breathe. It will probably be both. Hate to burst your bubble but most, if not all, politicians promise the moon before getting elected and hope you forget all that after he/she is elected.
Answered by bigmomma - Mon Jun 15 16:19:08 2009
Q. I am a librarian and I make $46,000 and my husband lost his job and gas is expensive and God knows I do not need any new taxes and I am sure that neither do you. And yesterday I read in a newspaper The Wall Street Journal that Sen. Baucus, the Finance Committee chairman considers new regressive taxes on poor folks like myself. His tax ideas include: to tax health care plans, penalize soda-pop drinking, tax alcohol, tax salty foods, further raise the price of cigarettes, charge for carbon, cut Medicare payments, or even implement a national sales tax. Fortunately I voted for Barack Obama and we won and he promised no new taxes on 95% of Americans an I am sure that he will veto all such plans. Like he fulfilled his promises of new… [cont.]
Asked by Teresa Jackson - Mon Jun 15 15:54:11 2009 - - 14 Answers - 0 Comments
A. How do you think Pres. Obama is going to pay for all his programs? You're going to be taxed no matter what he promised. It will be either a direct taxation or by sneaking taxes onto certain products or even taxing the air you breathe. It will probably be both. Hate to burst your bubble but most, if not all, politicians promise the moon before getting elected and hope you forget all that after he/she is elected.
Answered by bigmomma - Mon Jun 15 16:19:08 2009
What British reform movement did Benjamin Disraeli, Emmeline Pankhurst, and Millicent Garrett Fawcett support?
Q. 1. What British reform movement did Benjamin Disraeli, Emmeline Pankhurst, and Millicent Garrett Fawcett support? A. immigration reforms B. women s suffrage C. abolition of slavery D. improvement of factory conditions 2. After Charles X abdicated, French leaders formed what kind of government? A. Absolute monarchy B. Constitutional monarchy C. Democratic republic D. Empire 3. Louis Philippe s policies were responsible for sparking the Revolution of 1848, which led to A. the end of the Napoleonic era. B. the birth of the Second Republic. C. the birth of the Third Republic. D. the Dreyfus Affair. 4. Which of the following groups of people in Latin America was most likely to be attacked by… [cont.]
Asked by Phalliad - Thu Jun 11 01:06:17 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Do you go to Insight?
Answered by Timmeh - Fri Jun 12 06:34:02 2009
Q. 1. What British reform movement did Benjamin Disraeli, Emmeline Pankhurst, and Millicent Garrett Fawcett support? A. immigration reforms B. women s suffrage C. abolition of slavery D. improvement of factory conditions 2. After Charles X abdicated, French leaders formed what kind of government? A. Absolute monarchy B. Constitutional monarchy C. Democratic republic D. Empire 3. Louis Philippe s policies were responsible for sparking the Revolution of 1848, which led to A. the end of the Napoleonic era. B. the birth of the Second Republic. C. the birth of the Third Republic. D. the Dreyfus Affair. 4. Which of the following groups of people in Latin America was most likely to be attacked by… [cont.]
Asked by Phalliad - Thu Jun 11 01:06:17 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Do you go to Insight?
Answered by Timmeh - Fri Jun 12 06:34:02 2009
Do you think immigration reform is the key to lower down unemployment rate?
Q. Please read the definition of "reform" prior to answer my question, only educated answer will not be blocked. There are some stupid people out there I know and you know. re form /r f rm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-fawrm] Show IPA noun 1. the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc.: social reform; spelling reform. 2. an instance of this. 3. the amendment of conduct, belief, etc. verb (used with object) 4. to change to a better state, form, etc.; improve by alteration, substitution, abolition, etc. 5. to cause (a person) to abandon wrong or evil ways of life or conduct. 6. to put an end to (abuses, disorders, etc.). 7. Chemistry. to subject to the process of reforming, as in refining petroleum. verb ( [cont.]
Asked by PuzzleMe - Tue Oct 13 11:02:09 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. well, frankly, immagration has its pros and cons. its advantages are filling in gaps in labor force and introducing foreign businesses into the market and attracting more jobs. Bad thing is that if all jobs are full, then more extra people. bad business means bankruptcy, bankruptcy meansmore unemployed workers. Immigration is a very serious thing for every country as they have to weigh down everything about you and your career before getting you into their country. take for instance the US. the US offers green cards to everyone, but! there are some prerequisites that must be met first such as finance, health, family, status, etc. before entering into the country. Now that unemployment has hit the states, immigration is more likely to… [cont.]
Answered by Bigger_than_LIFE - Tue Oct 13 12:57:31 2009
Q. Please read the definition of "reform" prior to answer my question, only educated answer will not be blocked. There are some stupid people out there I know and you know. re form /r f rm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ri-fawrm] Show IPA noun 1. the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc.: social reform; spelling reform. 2. an instance of this. 3. the amendment of conduct, belief, etc. verb (used with object) 4. to change to a better state, form, etc.; improve by alteration, substitution, abolition, etc. 5. to cause (a person) to abandon wrong or evil ways of life or conduct. 6. to put an end to (abuses, disorders, etc.). 7. Chemistry. to subject to the process of reforming, as in refining petroleum. verb ( [cont.]
Asked by PuzzleMe - Tue Oct 13 11:02:09 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. well, frankly, immagration has its pros and cons. its advantages are filling in gaps in labor force and introducing foreign businesses into the market and attracting more jobs. Bad thing is that if all jobs are full, then more extra people. bad business means bankruptcy, bankruptcy meansmore unemployed workers. Immigration is a very serious thing for every country as they have to weigh down everything about you and your career before getting you into their country. take for instance the US. the US offers green cards to everyone, but! there are some prerequisites that must be met first such as finance, health, family, status, etc. before entering into the country. Now that unemployment has hit the states, immigration is more likely to… [cont.]
Answered by Bigger_than_LIFE - Tue Oct 13 12:57:31 2009
True and false question identify key terms if its false Please help me with this ?
Q. True and false question identify key terms if its false 1 a (caravel) was an explorer who wished to subjugate natives in america 2 (imperialism) is the process of creating colonies for the exclusive benefit of the mother country 3 an (emigrant) is a person who came to america by trading his labor for a certain amount of time for the cost of passage to america 4 a (loyalist) was a colonist who fought for the british during the american revolution 5 (constitutionalism) is the concept whereby a country has several layers of goverment that are responsible for different goverment service 6 (broad construction) is the concept that the goverment can only use powers specifically granted to it by the constitution 7 (sedition) is the statement… [cont.]
Asked by Sally J - Sat Nov 1 01:20:23 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. do your own work girl this is like totally cheating
Answered by danishjindani - Wed Nov 5 13:38:45 2008
Q. True and false question identify key terms if its false 1 a (caravel) was an explorer who wished to subjugate natives in america 2 (imperialism) is the process of creating colonies for the exclusive benefit of the mother country 3 an (emigrant) is a person who came to america by trading his labor for a certain amount of time for the cost of passage to america 4 a (loyalist) was a colonist who fought for the british during the american revolution 5 (constitutionalism) is the concept whereby a country has several layers of goverment that are responsible for different goverment service 6 (broad construction) is the concept that the goverment can only use powers specifically granted to it by the constitution 7 (sedition) is the statement… [cont.]
Asked by Sally J - Sat Nov 1 01:20:23 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. do your own work girl this is like totally cheating
Answered by danishjindani - Wed Nov 5 13:38:45 2008
true and false i dentify the false term for 10 points ?
Q. 11 an early concept that allowed the industrail revolution to take place was an improvement in manufacturing known as (interchaneable parts) 12 the (abolition) movement was a reform movement aimed at ending the sale of alcohol 13 (popular sovereignty) meant that the settlers themselves would decide on the issue of slavery in a territory 14 one way that opposition to the Civil war was supported was the denial of the right of (ex post facto) 15 (Misdemeanor) is the charging of the president with crimes worthy of removal from office 16 (jim crow laws) were created to keep most african americans in a lower legal status 17 a (homestead) was an area set aside exclusively for native american tribes 18 a (union) is a large corporation… [cont.]
Asked by danish20zindani - Wed Aug 13 14:55:21 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 11. true 12. false - it was prohibition 13. false 14. false 15. false - it is called impeachment 16. true 17. false - reservation 18. false - monopoly 19. false 20. false - inflation
Answered by masale - Wed Aug 13 15:10:45 2008
Q. 11 an early concept that allowed the industrail revolution to take place was an improvement in manufacturing known as (interchaneable parts) 12 the (abolition) movement was a reform movement aimed at ending the sale of alcohol 13 (popular sovereignty) meant that the settlers themselves would decide on the issue of slavery in a territory 14 one way that opposition to the Civil war was supported was the denial of the right of (ex post facto) 15 (Misdemeanor) is the charging of the president with crimes worthy of removal from office 16 (jim crow laws) were created to keep most african americans in a lower legal status 17 a (homestead) was an area set aside exclusively for native american tribes 18 a (union) is a large corporation… [cont.]
Asked by danish20zindani - Wed Aug 13 14:55:21 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 11. true 12. false - it was prohibition 13. false 14. false 15. false - it is called impeachment 16. true 17. false - reservation 18. false - monopoly 19. false 20. false - inflation
Answered by masale - Wed Aug 13 15:10:45 2008
Don't you hate the "What next?" argument. How might this have been used in the past?
Q. People cannot morally defend discriminatory or inhumane practices such as slave pay, sex and racial discriminatory practices, so they resort to ridiculous arguments about what "they" will be asking for next. For instance an argument against gay marriage is that next "they" will ask for marriage between man and animals.Let's have some fun by seeing how might this type of argument have been used in the past for reforms no one would think of arguing against today - votes for women, abolition of slavery etc.
Asked by Chris C - Fri Jun 25 05:04:22 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They'll be letting a caveman with smaller muscles than Ugg tell us where to hunt next.
Answered by Kryten - Fri Jun 25 05:06:37 2010
Q. People cannot morally defend discriminatory or inhumane practices such as slave pay, sex and racial discriminatory practices, so they resort to ridiculous arguments about what "they" will be asking for next. For instance an argument against gay marriage is that next "they" will ask for marriage between man and animals.Let's have some fun by seeing how might this type of argument have been used in the past for reforms no one would think of arguing against today - votes for women, abolition of slavery etc.
Asked by Chris C - Fri Jun 25 05:04:22 2010 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They'll be letting a caveman with smaller muscles than Ugg tell us where to hunt next.
Answered by Kryten - Fri Jun 25 05:06:37 2010
Does this sound more like a Conservative or a Liberal? 1920 Nazi platform?
Q. We therefore demand: 11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort. Breaking the Servitude of Interest 12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the Nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the Nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits. 13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into corporations (trusts). 14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises. 15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes. 16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low rates to… [cont.]
Asked by Dina W - Thu May 20 14:30:28 2010 - - 19 Answers - 2 Comments
A. Nazi Fascism. Not really left, not really right. Misfits of history and better off in the scrapheap where they belong.
Answered by Usagi Yojimbo - Thu May 20 14:32:55 2010
Q. We therefore demand: 11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort. Breaking the Servitude of Interest 12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the Nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the Nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits. 13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into corporations (trusts). 14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises. 15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes. 16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low rates to… [cont.]
Asked by Dina W - Thu May 20 14:30:28 2010 - - 19 Answers - 2 Comments
A. Nazi Fascism. Not really left, not really right. Misfits of history and better off in the scrapheap where they belong.
Answered by Usagi Yojimbo - Thu May 20 14:32:55 2010
Did you know the fabian socialist, both republican and democrat have changed the USA to a communist country?
Q. It's been happening for the last 100 years and it is time for the people to wake up. Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become communist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name ?? 1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose. The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income"… [cont.]
Asked by peaceandfearlesslove - Tue Feb 20 11:42:21 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I see where you are pointing out Socialist ideologies slowly permeating the USA but that does not mean it is Communism. There is a difference. Communism intended for all lands to be publicly owned, not state-controlled. Also, "Communism embraced a revolutionary ideology in which the state would wither away after the overthrow of the capitalist system. In practice, however, the State grew to control all aspects of communist society." - Oxford dictionary This means that the idea was implemented improperly and what most people refer to as "communism" is based on Russia's model and those that followed, which are bastardizations of the original idea. However, the US is becoming a "police state" for sure and the Patriot Act, etc. merely… [cont.]
Answered by David M - Tue Feb 20 11:56:50 2007
Q. It's been happening for the last 100 years and it is time for the people to wake up. Karl Marx was stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become communist or not. If they are all in effect and in force the country IS communist. Communism, but by any other name ?? 1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose. The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income"… [cont.]
Asked by peaceandfearlesslove - Tue Feb 20 11:42:21 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I see where you are pointing out Socialist ideologies slowly permeating the USA but that does not mean it is Communism. There is a difference. Communism intended for all lands to be publicly owned, not state-controlled. Also, "Communism embraced a revolutionary ideology in which the state would wither away after the overthrow of the capitalist system. In practice, however, the State grew to control all aspects of communist society." - Oxford dictionary This means that the idea was implemented improperly and what most people refer to as "communism" is based on Russia's model and those that followed, which are bastardizations of the original idea. However, the US is becoming a "police state" for sure and the Patriot Act, etc. merely… [cont.]
Answered by David M - Tue Feb 20 11:56:50 2007
Is Ms Jayalalitha aping Ms Indiraji's political strategies of weaning seniors..?
Q. Mrs Gandhi was described once in an article by Mr Alexander or so, as a lonely woman often separated from a politically busy dad, sick mother under treatment abroad, unloving auntie (Vijayalakshmi Pandit) who never liked Kamala Nehru also. So she was alone and suspicious of everyone, said the author who was close to the family in those days. As such when she became PM she suspected the grand old seniors like Morarji, Kamaraj etc and showed her mind by supporting a Presidential candidate not approved by the party (Mr VV Giri) asking party men to vote for the President according to their conscience. The Nehru loyals saw to it that Mr Giri won and thus the split of the great party was initiated. Eventhough she was bold and wise to bring many… [cont.]
Asked by Bala Venkat - Sun Jun 20 01:37:46 2010 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I ll answer this in a one liner. I agree with your view Bala sir that Jaya had a strong or even total control over her party senior leaders and all the other cadres. The main area she faltered is through her corrupt friend and her family Sasikal. I started to hate Jaya since I hate Sasikala to the core. I think the remedy to the wound of the Aiadmk is: Firstly to cut off Sasikala & Co or to mute them off (However she might join DMK also) To rebuilt AIADMK from scratch, which is close to impossible. The biggest challenge will be two things: To create a leader like MGR who was instrumental for AIADMK. To fight against the size of DMK's mega power.
Answered by Siva-The Zylus - Sun Jun 20 05:11:29 2010
Q. Mrs Gandhi was described once in an article by Mr Alexander or so, as a lonely woman often separated from a politically busy dad, sick mother under treatment abroad, unloving auntie (Vijayalakshmi Pandit) who never liked Kamala Nehru also. So she was alone and suspicious of everyone, said the author who was close to the family in those days. As such when she became PM she suspected the grand old seniors like Morarji, Kamaraj etc and showed her mind by supporting a Presidential candidate not approved by the party (Mr VV Giri) asking party men to vote for the President according to their conscience. The Nehru loyals saw to it that Mr Giri won and thus the split of the great party was initiated. Eventhough she was bold and wise to bring many… [cont.]
Asked by Bala Venkat - Sun Jun 20 01:37:46 2010 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I ll answer this in a one liner. I agree with your view Bala sir that Jaya had a strong or even total control over her party senior leaders and all the other cadres. The main area she faltered is through her corrupt friend and her family Sasikal. I started to hate Jaya since I hate Sasikala to the core. I think the remedy to the wound of the Aiadmk is: Firstly to cut off Sasikala & Co or to mute them off (However she might join DMK also) To rebuilt AIADMK from scratch, which is close to impossible. The biggest challenge will be two things: To create a leader like MGR who was instrumental for AIADMK. To fight against the size of DMK's mega power.
Answered by Siva-The Zylus - Sun Jun 20 05:11:29 2010
the GOP needs to move towards Moderate Republicans.?
Q. Tim Pawlenty the GOV of Minnesota. is a Moderate Republican. Moderates within the GOP tend to be, to varying degrees, fiscally conservative and socially liberal. While they often share the economic views of other Republicans - e.g., balanced budgets, lower taxes, free trade, deregulation, welfare reform - moderate Republicans differ in that they may be for some gay rights, abortion rights, gun control, environmental regulation, federal funding of education, fewer restrictions on legal immigration and illegal immigration, abolition of the death penalty, civil rights laws, legalization of drugs, stem cell research, anti-war policies, or any of the above. Deficit spending is a highly contentious issue, within this faction as well as… [cont.]
Asked by james dean - Thu Nov 13 21:10:46 2008 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. McCain is a moderate almost liberal republican...it didn't seem to work nationally. Maybe its time the GOP went back to grass roots conservatism. Or maybe it will loose its numbers to a more conservative independent party, and it can become the democrat part of the 50's. As for what you said regarding the religious right in the party. I totally agree that religious "values" have alienated a large group of true political conservatives from the GOP. I am a very right wing conservative when it comes to how I believe the government should be ran economically and socially. But I do not agree with letting your religious ideologies dictate your political ideologies. A true political conservative would tell the government to butt out of marriage… [cont.]
Answered by asmul8ed - Thu Nov 13 21:35:38 2008
Q. Tim Pawlenty the GOV of Minnesota. is a Moderate Republican. Moderates within the GOP tend to be, to varying degrees, fiscally conservative and socially liberal. While they often share the economic views of other Republicans - e.g., balanced budgets, lower taxes, free trade, deregulation, welfare reform - moderate Republicans differ in that they may be for some gay rights, abortion rights, gun control, environmental regulation, federal funding of education, fewer restrictions on legal immigration and illegal immigration, abolition of the death penalty, civil rights laws, legalization of drugs, stem cell research, anti-war policies, or any of the above. Deficit spending is a highly contentious issue, within this faction as well as… [cont.]
Asked by james dean - Thu Nov 13 21:10:46 2008 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
A. McCain is a moderate almost liberal republican...it didn't seem to work nationally. Maybe its time the GOP went back to grass roots conservatism. Or maybe it will loose its numbers to a more conservative independent party, and it can become the democrat part of the 50's. As for what you said regarding the religious right in the party. I totally agree that religious "values" have alienated a large group of true political conservatives from the GOP. I am a very right wing conservative when it comes to how I believe the government should be ran economically and socially. But I do not agree with letting your religious ideologies dictate your political ideologies. A true political conservative would tell the government to butt out of marriage… [cont.]
Answered by asmul8ed - Thu Nov 13 21:35:38 2008
How come atheists think this?
Q. Just to get it out of the way, I myself am neo-agnostic who supports practicing religion, however there is no real _scientific_ evidence to make the claim its true. So I was browsing a news site when I came along to an article about removing "Belief in God" from a michigan school's statement. Which, as long as it is public I support since the idea is to be religious neutral in schools. Note the neutral. I believe absent religion is no worse than fully religious. Anyways, the group who was bringing the lawsuit to court was "FFRF" which is Freedom from Religion Foundation. I have no issues with people who do not want public endorsements of religion. But when I was looking at their about page I saw this. "The history of Western… [cont.]
Asked by Secret - Thu Dec 17 13:11:20 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say that believers and unbelievers have both contributed to social, moral, and technological advances to Western Civilization. I find that fact quite undeniable, and I would invite those who say otherwise to quote their sources.
Answered by jtrusnik - Thu Dec 17 13:19:38 2009
Q. Just to get it out of the way, I myself am neo-agnostic who supports practicing religion, however there is no real _scientific_ evidence to make the claim its true. So I was browsing a news site when I came along to an article about removing "Belief in God" from a michigan school's statement. Which, as long as it is public I support since the idea is to be religious neutral in schools. Note the neutral. I believe absent religion is no worse than fully religious. Anyways, the group who was bringing the lawsuit to court was "FFRF" which is Freedom from Religion Foundation. I have no issues with people who do not want public endorsements of religion. But when I was looking at their about page I saw this. "The history of Western… [cont.]
Asked by Secret - Thu Dec 17 13:11:20 2009 - - 13 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I would say that believers and unbelievers have both contributed to social, moral, and technological advances to Western Civilization. I find that fact quite undeniable, and I would invite those who say otherwise to quote their sources.
Answered by jtrusnik - Thu Dec 17 13:19:38 2009
Can someone please help me translate these resolutions into plain english!?! I really need help!?
Q. RESOLVED, That we demand a free ballot and a fair count in all elections and pledge ourselves to secure it to every legal voter without Federal Intervention, through the adoption by the States of the unperverted Australian or secret ballot system. resolved, That the revenue derived from a graduated income tax should be applied to the reduction of the burden of taxation now levied upon the domestic industries of this country. resolved, That we pledge our support to fair and liberal pensions to ex-Union soldiers and sailors. resolved, That we condemn the fallacy of protecting American labor under the present system, which opens our ports to the pauper and criminal classes of the world and crowds out our wage-earners; and we denounce the… [cont.]
Asked by Max Paine - Thu Sep 3 11:03:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. do your own damn homework. if you can't figure out something you deserve to get a failing grade on it.
Answered by Tim - Thu Sep 3 11:13:36 2009
Q. RESOLVED, That we demand a free ballot and a fair count in all elections and pledge ourselves to secure it to every legal voter without Federal Intervention, through the adoption by the States of the unperverted Australian or secret ballot system. resolved, That the revenue derived from a graduated income tax should be applied to the reduction of the burden of taxation now levied upon the domestic industries of this country. resolved, That we pledge our support to fair and liberal pensions to ex-Union soldiers and sailors. resolved, That we condemn the fallacy of protecting American labor under the present system, which opens our ports to the pauper and criminal classes of the world and crowds out our wage-earners; and we denounce the… [cont.]
Asked by Max Paine - Thu Sep 3 11:03:55 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. do your own damn homework. if you can't figure out something you deserve to get a failing grade on it.
Answered by Tim - Thu Sep 3 11:13:36 2009
If the Germans lost the war, why do the elites in America have the same agenda?
Q. Pretty similiar dont you think? Not to mention our elites ban together to talk about eugenics, population control, euthanasia and infanticide. P.S. (Union Organizers I am not interested in your response) 13 We demand the nationalization of all trusts. 14 We demand profit-sharing in large industries. 17 We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. 18 We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death,… [cont.]
Asked by Crush Unions To Stop Communism - Wed May 26 17:53:37 2010 - - 4 Answers - 5 Comments
A. Short answer: the people who financed the rise of the Nazis and currently run the CFR and the Fed are not "Germans" or "Americans," (or even "Zionists," as many claim) ... they are "internationalists." Globalists. They often use nationalist arguments to sell their policies to the masses, but they don't actually believe in them. They have no allegiance to any country, rather, they sit outside countries and play them off of one another. Whatever furthers their goal of power consolidation. And what is the ultimate consolidation of power? Why, world government, of course. Hope that helps!
Answered by Socrates - Wed May 26 18:06:05 2010
Q. Pretty similiar dont you think? Not to mention our elites ban together to talk about eugenics, population control, euthanasia and infanticide. P.S. (Union Organizers I am not interested in your response) 13 We demand the nationalization of all trusts. 14 We demand profit-sharing in large industries. 17 We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. 18 We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death,… [cont.]
Asked by Crush Unions To Stop Communism - Wed May 26 17:53:37 2010 - - 4 Answers - 5 Comments
A. Short answer: the people who financed the rise of the Nazis and currently run the CFR and the Fed are not "Germans" or "Americans," (or even "Zionists," as many claim) ... they are "internationalists." Globalists. They often use nationalist arguments to sell their policies to the masses, but they don't actually believe in them. They have no allegiance to any country, rather, they sit outside countries and play them off of one another. Whatever furthers their goal of power consolidation. And what is the ultimate consolidation of power? Why, world government, of course. Hope that helps!
Answered by Socrates - Wed May 26 18:06:05 2010
Do you agree with these points from a political platform?
Q. 11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished. 12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits. 13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts. 14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries. 15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions. 16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies… [cont.]
Asked by pdooma - Fri Sep 25 23:27:00 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. ...That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished... Would this include interest earned on money in a bank?
Answered by Captain Parker - Fri Sep 25 23:37:27 2009
Q. 11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished. 12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits. 13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts. 14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries. 15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions. 16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies… [cont.]
Asked by pdooma - Fri Sep 25 23:27:00 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. ...That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished... Would this include interest earned on money in a bank?
Answered by Captain Parker - Fri Sep 25 23:37:27 2009
home work help did i get these right?
Q. 1. someone who rules over a kingdom (1 point) (is a king) 2. to trade (1 point) (to give sumthing 4 sumthing els) 3. an era of enormous creativity and rapid change begun in Italy in the 1300s (1 point) im not sure abiut this 1 4. large farm (1 point) (plantation) 5. a revival of religious feeling in the colonies (1 point) not sure Multiple Choice Choose the item that best completes the statement or answers the question. 6. Increased colonial production of staple crops like tobacco and rice led to (1 point) a decrease in the use of indentured servants as a labor force. the establishment of the Navigation Act. an increase in the number of slaves brought from Africa.(this 1) a lessening of the flow of immigrants to the… [cont.]
Asked by Caleb - Mon Oct 5 16:53:10 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1.G 2.B 3.D 4.C 5.K 6. an increase in the number of slaves brought from Africa. 7. water route across North America. 8. escape religious persecution. 9. They wanted a quicker trade route to India. 10. the potato 11. representation in the legislature. 12. it made the national government too strong. 13. printing bank notes with no specie backing. 14. an increase in the birth rate. 15. eliminate the consumption of alcohol. 100% good luck!
Answered by poppie - Tue Oct 6 04:13:09 2009
Q. 1. someone who rules over a kingdom (1 point) (is a king) 2. to trade (1 point) (to give sumthing 4 sumthing els) 3. an era of enormous creativity and rapid change begun in Italy in the 1300s (1 point) im not sure abiut this 1 4. large farm (1 point) (plantation) 5. a revival of religious feeling in the colonies (1 point) not sure Multiple Choice Choose the item that best completes the statement or answers the question. 6. Increased colonial production of staple crops like tobacco and rice led to (1 point) a decrease in the use of indentured servants as a labor force. the establishment of the Navigation Act. an increase in the number of slaves brought from Africa.(this 1) a lessening of the flow of immigrants to the… [cont.]
Asked by Caleb - Mon Oct 5 16:53:10 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1.G 2.B 3.D 4.C 5.K 6. an increase in the number of slaves brought from Africa. 7. water route across North America. 8. escape religious persecution. 9. They wanted a quicker trade route to India. 10. the potato 11. representation in the legislature. 12. it made the national government too strong. 13. printing bank notes with no specie backing. 14. an increase in the birth rate. 15. eliminate the consumption of alcohol. 100% good luck!
Answered by poppie - Tue Oct 6 04:13:09 2009
Unit Nine Test B Insight Students!?
Q. Andrew Jackson gave party supporters simple government jobs because he believed in A.the reward system. B.the spoils system. C.suffrage for all citizens. D.the caucus system. 2.The Southern states resentment over more tariffs prompted South Carolina to pass an ordinance that states could declare federal laws invalid, an idea called that was called A.suffrage. B.federalism. C.nullification. D.unification. 3.What prompted Jackson to authorize the Force Bill, which gave him the authority to mobilize the military to enforce acts of Congress? A.The ordinance of nullification adopted by a special state convention in South Carolina B.A bill pushed through Congress by South Carolina senator Henry Clay to lower the nation s tariffs C.An… [cont.]
Asked by insight student - Tue Nov 3 15:38:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. b c a d a d b c b d a b d b c a b d
Answered by Lauryn - Thu Nov 5 14:08:32 2009
Q. Andrew Jackson gave party supporters simple government jobs because he believed in A.the reward system. B.the spoils system. C.suffrage for all citizens. D.the caucus system. 2.The Southern states resentment over more tariffs prompted South Carolina to pass an ordinance that states could declare federal laws invalid, an idea called that was called A.suffrage. B.federalism. C.nullification. D.unification. 3.What prompted Jackson to authorize the Force Bill, which gave him the authority to mobilize the military to enforce acts of Congress? A.The ordinance of nullification adopted by a special state convention in South Carolina B.A bill pushed through Congress by South Carolina senator Henry Clay to lower the nation s tariffs C.An… [cont.]
Asked by insight student - Tue Nov 3 15:38:27 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. b c a d a d b c b d a b d b c a b d
Answered by Lauryn - Thu Nov 5 14:08:32 2009
Fascist Liberal Economy?
Q. I just read the book liberal fascism and I had always assumed that fascism or nazism was conservative. I know it sure was socially (nationalist, religious and so on). However what I realized was that from what I read I discovered that the nazi's were really quite liberal economically. Even Adolf Hitler criticized capitalism for only benefiting the jews. So what do you think after reading this excerpt from wikipedia. Is fascism Socialist or a mixed economy? The original "Twenty-Five Point Programme" of the party, adopted in 1920, listed several economic demands (including "the abolition of all incomes unearned by work," "the ruthless confiscation of all war profits," "the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into… [cont.]
Asked by Eric J - Mon Mar 3 17:24:29 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Fascism is authoritarian, not right or left. Adolf Hitler advocated authoritarian social, economic, and political policies. The Nazis called themselves German National Socialists. They believed in a regulated economy, but they didn't like communists even though they shared similar economic positions with communists. 'Conservative' in the United States means classical liberalism for the most part - pro-capitalism, pro-free trade, pro-business. 'Conservative' in Europe refers to an old order that's not necessarily pro-capitalism or pro-business. In fact, many European conservatives find capitalism offensive and almost tactless. In the UK, conservatives tend to be more pro-monarchy. 'Liberals' in other countries usually have more in common… [cont.]
Answered by TheOrange Evil - Mon Mar 3 17:32:55 2008
Q. I just read the book liberal fascism and I had always assumed that fascism or nazism was conservative. I know it sure was socially (nationalist, religious and so on). However what I realized was that from what I read I discovered that the nazi's were really quite liberal economically. Even Adolf Hitler criticized capitalism for only benefiting the jews. So what do you think after reading this excerpt from wikipedia. Is fascism Socialist or a mixed economy? The original "Twenty-Five Point Programme" of the party, adopted in 1920, listed several economic demands (including "the abolition of all incomes unearned by work," "the ruthless confiscation of all war profits," "the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into… [cont.]
Asked by Eric J - Mon Mar 3 17:24:29 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Fascism is authoritarian, not right or left. Adolf Hitler advocated authoritarian social, economic, and political policies. The Nazis called themselves German National Socialists. They believed in a regulated economy, but they didn't like communists even though they shared similar economic positions with communists. 'Conservative' in the United States means classical liberalism for the most part - pro-capitalism, pro-free trade, pro-business. 'Conservative' in Europe refers to an old order that's not necessarily pro-capitalism or pro-business. In fact, many European conservatives find capitalism offensive and almost tactless. In the UK, conservatives tend to be more pro-monarchy. 'Liberals' in other countries usually have more in common… [cont.]
Answered by TheOrange Evil - Mon Mar 3 17:32:55 2008
Who can identify these quotes without using Google?
Q. All the talk lately about right wing extremism vs. left wing extremism, fascism vs. socialism, Hitler vs. Stalin vs. Obama, and so on had me researching some replies, and I found some interesting stuff. I know everyone is omnipotent thanks to Google. I'm asking that you try, just for fun, to identify the speaker in the following quotes WITHOUT resorting to a search engine, and then tell me if you consider them left wing or right wing. True, it is a fixed idea with the French that the Rhine is their property, but to this arrogant demand the only reply worthy of the German nation is Arndt's: "Give back Alsace and Lorraine". For I am of the opinion, perhaps in contrast to many whose standpoint I share in other respects, that the… [cont.]
Asked by Bigsky_52 - Fri Jun 12 14:25:45 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. OK, I'll give it a shot. For the first, Winston Churchill. Second, Henry Ford. Third, Dennis Kucinich. Just kidding on the third one. Karl Marx maybe?
Answered by John D "Your ad here" - Fri Jun 12 14:37:27 2009
Q. All the talk lately about right wing extremism vs. left wing extremism, fascism vs. socialism, Hitler vs. Stalin vs. Obama, and so on had me researching some replies, and I found some interesting stuff. I know everyone is omnipotent thanks to Google. I'm asking that you try, just for fun, to identify the speaker in the following quotes WITHOUT resorting to a search engine, and then tell me if you consider them left wing or right wing. True, it is a fixed idea with the French that the Rhine is their property, but to this arrogant demand the only reply worthy of the German nation is Arndt's: "Give back Alsace and Lorraine". For I am of the opinion, perhaps in contrast to many whose standpoint I share in other respects, that the… [cont.]
Asked by Bigsky_52 - Fri Jun 12 14:25:45 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. OK, I'll give it a shot. For the first, Winston Churchill. Second, Henry Ford. Third, Dennis Kucinich. Just kidding on the third one. Karl Marx maybe?
Answered by John D "Your ad here" - Fri Jun 12 14:37:27 2009
*WILL GIVE 20 POINTS!!!* World History Help Please!?
Q. Heyy, yall. I really need help in history! I have researched my questions and the answers with the * next to them is what my researched answer is. Although, if I am wrong please correct me. I will give you 20 point by asking another random/stupid question that you can answer, and I'll give you 10 points best answer here and 10 points best answer there. Any answers you can give I am greatful for. I'm desperate! Please Help!!! Thanks^_^ As the Europeans explored the Americas, they would encounter new plants, animals, and diseases. All of the following plants and animals would have been new to Europeans except cacao (chocolate). *pumpkins. horses. tobacco. Select the correct statement regarding the slave trade. The… [cont.]
Asked by baybgurl - Tue Feb 16 18:11:06 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1. Horses, Europeans took horses to conquer the Americas, the natives thought they were riding giant deer. Horses are common in Europe. 2.all of the above 3.John Calvin and Ulrich Zwingli 4.*False it was the Atlantic 5.*Calvinist churches were filled with music. 6.*A religious figure pardoned one's sins and could reduce the amount of time in purgatory if money was paid to the Church. 7. True 8. Education was popular with the reformers, it allowed more people to read the Bible.
Answered by TheLibrarian - Tue Feb 16 18:26:45 2010
Q. Heyy, yall. I really need help in history! I have researched my questions and the answers with the * next to them is what my researched answer is. Although, if I am wrong please correct me. I will give you 20 point by asking another random/stupid question that you can answer, and I'll give you 10 points best answer here and 10 points best answer there. Any answers you can give I am greatful for. I'm desperate! Please Help!!! Thanks^_^ As the Europeans explored the Americas, they would encounter new plants, animals, and diseases. All of the following plants and animals would have been new to Europeans except cacao (chocolate). *pumpkins. horses. tobacco. Select the correct statement regarding the slave trade. The… [cont.]
Asked by baybgurl - Tue Feb 16 18:11:06 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. 1. Horses, Europeans took horses to conquer the Americas, the natives thought they were riding giant deer. Horses are common in Europe. 2.all of the above 3.John Calvin and Ulrich Zwingli 4.*False it was the Atlantic 5.*Calvinist churches were filled with music. 6.*A religious figure pardoned one's sins and could reduce the amount of time in purgatory if money was paid to the Church. 7. True 8. Education was popular with the reformers, it allowed more people to read the Bible.
Answered by TheLibrarian - Tue Feb 16 18:26:45 2010
Did all liberals go to public school? Don't they know Nazis were socialists?
Q. Liberals that obviously don't know history keep saying that the right wing are nazis. I thought ID give your education a little nudge in the right direction. Did they manage to miss the 25 founding tenants of nazism?> Can an educated person not see socialism here? 2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated. Like obama not following nafta and gatt after his party made them law? 7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. Wow, can you say the DNCs "living wage" program? 9. All citizens must possess equal… [cont.]
Asked by gissim0 - Fri Sep 4 10:02:28 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yeah in my experience, libs are by far the most likely to accuse people of being Nazi/racist/fascist et cetera, but when you really look at it objectively, their idealism is much closer to National Socialism, by definition, than anything coming out of the right. I especially got a kick out of the guy that said, "National Socialism isn't socialism." Who is he trying to kid? I guess the self-deceiving liberal intellect thinks that such a ridiculous assertion will fool someone. Socialism fails every time it is tried, and every time, there's some bunch of liberals claiming that this time it will be different. I recognize the Nazi agenda in everything they do: the demonization of whites, the overt use of propaganda, the pity tactics, the… [cont.]
Answered by veggie boy - Fri Sep 4 15:09:19 2009
Q. Liberals that obviously don't know history keep saying that the right wing are nazis. I thought ID give your education a little nudge in the right direction. Did they manage to miss the 25 founding tenants of nazism?> Can an educated person not see socialism here? 2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated. Like obama not following nafta and gatt after his party made them law? 7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. Wow, can you say the DNCs "living wage" program? 9. All citizens must possess equal… [cont.]
Asked by gissim0 - Fri Sep 4 10:02:28 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Yeah in my experience, libs are by far the most likely to accuse people of being Nazi/racist/fascist et cetera, but when you really look at it objectively, their idealism is much closer to National Socialism, by definition, than anything coming out of the right. I especially got a kick out of the guy that said, "National Socialism isn't socialism." Who is he trying to kid? I guess the self-deceiving liberal intellect thinks that such a ridiculous assertion will fool someone. Socialism fails every time it is tried, and every time, there's some bunch of liberals claiming that this time it will be different. I recognize the Nazi agenda in everything they do: the demonization of whites, the overt use of propaganda, the pity tactics, the… [cont.]
Answered by veggie boy - Fri Sep 4 15:09:19 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'Abolition or Reform'
Tue Sep 7 11:29:58 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
bbc.co.uk
Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:53:16 GMT+00:00
BBC News The findings come despite the abolition of tuition fees for students in Scotland, unlike south of the border. A Scottish government spokesman said: "Even ...
republic.org.uk
200px x 200px | 8.40kB
[source page]
Constitutional Royal Prerogatives Church of England Written Constitution Dissolution of Parliament Appointment of Prime Minister Fully elected Upper House Abolition or reform of the
youtube.com
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:47:33 PDT
To help poland be free, he left money with thomas jefferson to fight for the abolition of slavery. through all of the wars, poland has always been ... youtube.com.
ks-fcrc.blogspot.com
Claudine Dombrowski
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:14:00 GM
Court-appt'd Parenting Evaluators and GALs: The Case for . Abolition. by Margaret Dore pdfscholar. Guardians ad Litem in Custody Litigation: The Case for . Abolition. by Richard Ducote pdfscholar. Guardians for Profit: LA Times expose, ...
[Hide]▲
